SLATE LECTURE SERIES
|
Upcoming lectures: Carol A.
Chapelle, Iowa State University, Michael T. Ullman,
Georgetown University |
SLATE is pleased to announce
the speakers for this semester. All times are 7:30-8:30 with reception
following. Stay tuned for more information.
Thursday, March 29, 2001
Carol A. Chapelle, Iowa
State University
Title: Evaluating CALL: Questions for the 21st Century
Place: Lucy Ellis Lounge (Foreign Languages Building)
Time: Thursday, March 29, 2001, 7:30 pm
In an era when many language learners and teachers assume that technology
should be one vehicle for second language learning, most researchers
agree that investigations of computer-assisted language learning (CALL)
are too limited if they seek only to compare learning outcomes of
CALL users with those of learners in traditional classrooms. Despite
the definitive move away from such comparisons as a sole research
strategy, the intuitive appeal in demonstrating superior effects from
technology has kept this research tradition alive. Moreover, it would
be difficult to argue that the results of such research are uninteresting.
What is the problem with the control-treatment study for investigating
CALL? What alternative approaches have been attempted, and how can
the various research approaches be seen as complimentary sources of
information? This paper will explain an approach to identifying important
questions about CALL and applying relevant research methods to address
these questions. It will suggest that the issue for the 21st century
is how best to integrate multiple sources of research results to evaluate
CALL.
Thursday, April 5, 2001
Michael T. Ullman (Departments
of Neuroscience and Linguistics, Georgetown
University)
Title: The Declarative/Procedural
Model of Language: Extensions to Sex Differences and Second Language
Place: Lucy Ellis Lounge (Foreign
Languages Building)
Time: Thursday, April 5, 2001,
7:30 pm
Our use of language depends upon two capacities: a mental lexicon
of memorized words, and a mental grammar of rules that underlie the
productive sequential and hierarchical composition of lexical forms
into complex linguistic representations--i.e., complex words, phrases
and sentences. The Declarative/Procedural model posits that the learning
and use of lexical knowledge depends upon a well-studied bilateral
temporal-lobe "declarative memory" system implicated in
the learning and use of conceptual/semantic knowledge (i.e., knowledge
about the world), while grammatical computations that underlie the
real-time combination of lexical forms into complex representations
rely on left frontal/basal-ganglia "procedural" circuits
implicated in the acquisition and expression of motor and cognitive
skills (e.g., riding a bicycle).
The Declarative/Procedural model predicts double dissociations between
lexicon and grammar, with associations among lexical memory, memorized
facts, and temporal-lobe structures, and among grammar, motor skills,
and frontal/basal-ganglia structures. The model is supported by studies
investigating morphology and syntax; using a range of psycholinguistic
and neurolinguistic approaches, including behavioral testing of patients
with aphasia, neurodegenerative disease or developmental disorders,
and neuroimaging investigations of healthy subjects (using fMRI, MEG,
and EEG/ERP); with children and adults; examining several languages
(English, German, Japanese, and Italian).
Two extensions of the model are discussed. First, sex differences
in the neurocognition of lexicon and grammar are examined. Robust
evidence indicates that females are better than males at remembering
words. This suggests the novel hypothesis that females may tend to
memorize previously-encountered complex forms (e.g., played),
while males generally compute these forms compositionally (e.g., play
+ -ed). Both sexes should compute new complex forms compositionally
(e.g., proy + -ed). These predictions are confirmed
with converging evidence from psycholinguistic, neuropsychological,
and neuro-electrophysiological studies examining the processing of
complex words and sentences.
Second, neurocognitive differences between first and second language
are examined. Evidence suggests a critical (sensitive) period in the
acquisition and use of grammar: Older learners have greater difficulty
than younger learners. This leads to the hypothesis that older second
language learners, being unable to depend upon the procedural/grammatical
system, are forced to rely on the declarative/lexical system for the
computation of complex linguistic representations. These representations
may be either memorized, or constructed by explicit rules learned
in declarative memory. This shift to declarative/lexical memory is
expected to increase with increasing age of exposure to the language,
and with less experience (practice) with the language, which is predicted
to improve the procedural/grammatical learning of grammatical rules.
Evidence is presented in support of these predictions.
Age at
Immigration and Second Language Proficiency Among Foreign-born Adults:
Insights from U.S. Census Data
Gillian Stevens
Departments of Sociology and Advertising
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
October 10, 2002
Abstract
Sociologists typically assume that acquisition of English language
skills follows opportunities and motivations to become proficient
in English while many linguists argue that language acquisition may
be governed by maturational constraints, possibly biologically based,
that are tied to age at onset of language learning. In this
paper, I use U.S. census data to investigate the relationship between
age at onset of second language learning and levels of English language
proficiency among foreign-born adults in the United States. The overarching
conclusion is that proficiency in a second language among adults is
strongly related to age at immigration. Part of that relationship
is attributable to social and demographic considerations tied to age
at entry into a new country, and part of that relationship may be
attributable to maturational constraints.
Researching the input,
interaction and L2 development relationship: Modified output and working
memory
Professor Alison Mackey
Department of Linguistics
Georgetown University
April 25, 2002
Abstract
A great deal of current SLA research on the role of input
and interaction in the L2 learning process is investigating how interaction
positively impacts L2 learning. This presentation will describe an
empirical study of the relationship between working memory and modified
output in order to illustrate how consideration of internal learner
capacities may advance current research on L2 interaction.
A number of empirical studies have suggested that working memory may
play a role in second language learning (N. Ellis, 1996; Ellis &
Schmidt, 1997; Ellis & Sinclair, 1996; Harrington & Sawyer,
1992; Miyake & Friedman, 1998; Papagno, Valentine & Baddeley,
1991; Sawyer & Ranta, 2001; Service, 1992; Williams, 1999). Swain
(1985, 1995) has argued that producing output may facilitate L2 learning
in a number of ways, including encouraging syntactic processing, promoting
automaticity and pushing learners to move to the "cutting edge"
of their interlanguage abilities. Empirical second language acquisition
research exploring the effects of interaction on learning has indicated
a relationship between modifications that learners make to their output
after receiving feedback during interaction and their L2 learning
outcomes (Gass, Mackey & Pica, 1998). This study described in
this presentation explores the relationship between L2 learners' working
memory capacities and the sorts of modifications they make to their
output following feedback during conversational interaction.
Psychometric tests of working memory capacity in the L1 and the L2
were administered to college level native English speaking learners
of Spanish as a foreign language. The learners received interactional
feedback from native Spanish speakers during 45-minute sessions of
dyadic task-based interaction. The quantity, quality and linguistic
objects of feedback were carefully controlled. Analyses investigated
the amount and types of modifications that learners made to their
output during interaction in the context of their scores on the working
memory tests. The results show that learners with high working memory
capacities were the ones who most often modified their original non-TL
utterances following feedback, suggesting that an interesting relationship
exists between learners' working memory capacities and their production
of modified output during interaction.
The results are discussed in relation to findings from two other studies,
which emphasize the importance of context in the interaction-feedback-L2
learning relationship. The presentation will conclude with a discussion
of how consideration of both cognitive and contextual variables may
collectively fuel future empirical explorations of the question of
how interaction works.
Conversation Analysis
as an approach to Second Language Acquisition: Old wine in new bottles?
Professor Gabi
Kasper
Department of Second Language Sudies
University of Hawaii at Manoa
March 13, 2002
Abstract
Since its inception,
second language acquisition (SLA) has been informed by sociolinguistics.
Various forms of discourse analysis have been influential in SLA for
the past 20 years. More recently, SLA has seen an upsurge of qualitative
approaches originating in various social sciences, one of them being
Conversation Analysis (CA). In order to choose judiciously from the
increasing variety of sociolinguistic and discourse approaches, it
is crucial for SLA researchers to understand the potential and limitations
of such approaches for SLA. In this talk, I will discuss some of the
specific contributions that CA can make to SLA and some of the problems
involved in doing CA on L2 learner data.
Performance Consistency
in Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research: A Conceptual
Gap
Professor Dan Douglas
Department of English
Iowa State University
October 25, 2001
Abstract: Arguing from the premise that a language test is
a special case of a second language acquisition device, I suggest
that SLA and language testing share much common ground in terms of
research methods, which have similar properties in that they are both
used to make systematic observations of language performances from
which inferences can be made about the state of a learners interlanguage
ability underlying the performance. However, I also argue that whereas
the concept of demonstrating validity and reliability has been integrated
into how language testing research is conducted, SLA researchers have
generally failed to recognize the need to demonstrate these qualities.
I compare examples of SLA and language testing research articles in
terms of their treatment of validity and reliability and argue that
it is important for SLA researchers to provide evidence that the methods
they employ to elicit data are appropriate for the purposes intended,
that the procedures provide stable and consistent data, and consequently
that the interpretations they make of the results are justified.
Motivational aspects of
studying foreign languages: Results of a national survey
Professor Zoltán Dörnyei
School of English Studies
University of Nottingham
January 16, 2002
Abstract
This talk presents the results of one of the biggest-ever attitudinal/motivational
surveys conducted in the L2 field (N=8,593). In order to investigate
how a rather turbulent period in Hungary that involved significant
sociocultural changes (related to the fall of Communism) affected
school children's language-related attitudes and language learning
motivation during the 1990's, two consecutive surveys were conducted
among 13/14-year-old pupils (in 1993 and at the very end of 1999).
A novel element of the investigation was that it focused on five different
target languages, English, German, French, Italian and Russian, which
allowed cross-language comparisons. Furthermore, the repeated measure
design made it possible to explore the changes that characterized
the learners' motivation between the two phases of the survey. Data
were collected from every part of the country, including tourist attractions,
big cities and remote villages; thus, we are now in the unique position
that we can provide a rounded description of the attitudinal/motivational
setup of a whole speech community within a dynamic perspective.
The results shed light on a number of important issues: (a) the composition
of L2 motivation and differences according to different target languages;
(b) how motivation affects actual language choice (i.e. selecting
an L2 for future studies) and expended effort; (c) gender differences;
and (d) geopolitical factors affecting L2 motivation. With respect
to the observed attitudinal/motivational changes, an unexpected but
potentially very important finding was that during the examined period
the learners' general language learning commitment showed a significant
decline, with only English maintaining its position. This can be seen
as a reflection of a more general 'language globalization' process,
whereby the study of the world language (i.e. English) and that of
other foreign languages show an increasingly deviating pattern. A
related, but similarly surprising finding was that increased contact
with foreigners and foreign cultural products (brought about by the
liberalization of Hungarian politics and economy in the 1990's) did
not result in the improvement of language attitudes but actually reduced
the perceived quality of interethnic contact. The presentation will
be concluded by discussing the practical implications of the results.
See Fall 2000 SLATE Lectures
See Spring 2000 SLATE Lectures
See Fall 1999 SLATE Lectures